| Unofficial Translation
Gorod N
Vladimir Melnikov: "Our Goal Is $1bln. in Turnover a Year"
By Sergei Stroitelev
April 23, 2003
Page 2
In April 2003 Interactive Research Group (IRG), an independent market
research firm, presented a list of the "Top 100 Emerging Companies
of the Russian Consumer Market" in Moscow and London. Two enterprises
from the Rostov region, Gloria Jeans and Yug Rusi, appeared on the list.
Judging from the research, the analysts tried to indicate to Western investors
the most promising, fast-growing and financially attractive Russian companies.
We plan to publish an interview with the head of Yug Rusi, Sergei Kislov,
in one of our next issues. Gloria Jeans' president Vladimir Melnikov pointed
out two reasons behind the company's breaking onto the "tidbits list."
The market for jeans is very promising in Russia, but the firm was also
given credit for its transparency. He added that both factors would greatly
favor Gloria Jeans in the near future either in negotiations with strategic
investors or in the course of entering Western stock markets.
Q: What is your attitude toward this research? In your opinion,
why did Gloria appear in the list?
A: There are neither raw material companies nor well-known companies,
such as Wimm-Bill-Dann, on the list. In other words, IRG analyzed the
"second echelon," fast-growing Russian companies in the consumer
market, targeting a turnover of $1 billion. I think there should have
been a firm representing the agricultural business on the list. As for
my company, we have just demonstrated that the agricultural segment is
not the only area to reach success. The experts probably took into consideration
the market prospects (believe me, the prospects are very good), as well
as the corporate structure, reputation and transparency of the company.
Q: What do you mean when you refer to the transparency of your
company?
A: We are ready to answer any questions from our partners about
the company's activities, ownership structure, salaries, the situation
on the market or labor management. Part of this information is accessible
on our website free-of-charge; more detailed questions are promptly handled
by our experts. There is a considerable flow of requests from abroad.
The company has been offered joint ventures, promotion of our products
in new markets and investments. We invariably stress our openness. In
my opinion there is no other way to develop. Try to ask me a question
I would not be able to answer.
Q: In terms of ownership the situation is clear: in purchasing
the 25 percent stake from the EBRD, you became the sole owner of the company.
How much did you pay? As far as I can remember, this information was classified.
By the way, have you paid it off? Is the deal finalized?
A: The shares have already been transferred to me. The agreement with
the EBRD was that we would pay in installments. The last payment of $600,000
is coming soon. The total price for the 25 percent stake stands at $6,000,000.
Q: The EBRD had bought this stake for $3,000,000, which means
they received a 100 percent profit after four years.
A: Or 25 percent yearly interest in hard currency.
Q: That is not bad, even for venture capital.
A: I hope that this experience will help us in our further search
for an investor.
Q: When you decided to part with the EBRD you mentioned your need
for a strategic investor. Many ask why, given the good shape and fast
growth of your company.
A: It is quite simple. Our goal is to reach a turnover of $1bln,
compared to the current figure, which is slightly over $100,000,000. It
might take us 10-12 years to do this by ourselves. With the help of a
strategic investor, it would be feasible within 4-5 years. Investors can
provide the company with cheap money and advanced technology. I am certain
that I would rather own a small part of a large business, than vice versa.
Q: You have not found such a partner yet. What is the problem?
A: It is a double-sided problem. We must work out a new strategy
and rearrange our priorities. Our old strategy was formulated back in
1998. Then, our production volume accounted only for $15,000,000 a year.
Now the scope is different. This means that we should change the team
and set up new goals. We are going to invite one of the top three consulting
companies in the world to work on Gloria's new strategy. This service
is extremely expensive - $5-7 million. Some people are trying to talk
me out of it. After all, we worked really hard to make this profit. However,
we have to go for it in order to keep progressing to new levels. Actually,
we are not quite ready to answer the questions of serious investors. On
the other hand, serious investors are shunning us. They just say: "Your
country has always swindled us." They need high-level guarantees.
This is certainly another problem.
Q: Are there any other ways to boost your development?
A: We have interesting offers to place our shares on the New York
and London stock markets. I think when we reach $250,000,000 we will be
able to do that. The prospects for getting large amounts of cheap money
for further development will be real then.
Q: To what extent is the attractiveness of the region and location
of the investment subject important for a particular investor? If a company
is evaluated in terms of market prospects and transparency, what is the
main attraction to a particular region?
A: Certainly this is taken into account. We can see some common
traits in firms. If a company is not transparent and is engaged in shady
business, I, as a chief, would appoint people personally loyal to me to
key positions. These top managers are trusted. If I am in a legal business,
I have no need for loyal people. In this case I invite professionals and
set only professional tasks. Only professionals are able push a company
forward. Although in politics the situation is not as simple, transparency
is a great advantage for both a company and a particular region.
|